<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome Move on Mexico&#8217;s Drug Wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.latintelligence.com/2010/03/24/welcome-move-on-mexicos-drug-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.latintelligence.com/2010/03/24/welcome-move-on-mexicos-drug-wars/</link>
	<description>by Shannon K. O'Neil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:41:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Obregon</title>
		<link>http://www.latintelligence.com/2010/03/24/welcome-move-on-mexicos-drug-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-27571</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Obregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 04:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latintelligence.com/?p=711#comment-27571</guid>
		<description>Excellent comment Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comment Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selective Impunity</title>
		<link>http://www.latintelligence.com/2010/03/24/welcome-move-on-mexicos-drug-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-16094</link>
		<dc:creator>Selective Impunity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latintelligence.com/?p=711#comment-16094</guid>
		<description>[...] may have been welcome news for a city and country where impunity reigns and police often arrive too late. The arrest of the Aztecas leader could suggest that the system [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may have been welcome news for a city and country where impunity reigns and police often arrive too late. The arrest of the Aztecas leader could suggest that the system [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Charlton</title>
		<link>http://www.latintelligence.com/2010/03/24/welcome-move-on-mexicos-drug-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-16093</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Charlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latintelligence.com/?p=711#comment-16093</guid>
		<description>I can certainly understand Secretary Clinton&#039;s refusal to discuss either decriminalization or legalization as a means to reduce drug demand.  First, it is something of a third rail in political discussion but more importantly, we have no real idea whether it would work. We might find out more about that alternative if California legalizes marijuana sales but at this point there is no data to support such a move.  We also can only speculate whether such a move would actually reduce the violence in Mexico; if there is any truth to the assertion that the cartels are already involved in US domestic drug production, then the answer would almost certainly be no.

This, however, is not to say that we can&#039;t reduce drug demand.  The last year has seen significant increas in research funding into methamphetamine addiction for which there is currently no proven therapy. The cartels manufacture and create most of the methamphetamine intended for US consumption.  There have been an increasing number of steps taken by the US judicial system to divert drug offenders from prison to rehabilitation and an increasing sense that we incarcerate far too many drug offenders.

What is missing, however, from the discussion is the extent to which reducing drug demand increases our security and thus, is in our national interest to pursue.  There seems to be no interest in discussing the real financial impact of US drug consumption on the Mexican economy. We can read in American newspapers that drug monies contribute anywhere from $12 billion (General Berry McCaffrey) to as much as $35 billion or more but we have no way of assessing which of those extremes is more accurate.

We can&#039;t seem to discuss to what extent our drug consumption supports the Mexican economy, if it does, and what effect might reducing demand have on increasing emigration from Mexico to the US. 

I guess in short, I am glad that there is some sense that we, as a country, bear some responsibility but we need more of of a committment to understanding that relationship and what we can realistically hope to achive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can certainly understand Secretary Clinton&#8217;s refusal to discuss either decriminalization or legalization as a means to reduce drug demand.  First, it is something of a third rail in political discussion but more importantly, we have no real idea whether it would work. We might find out more about that alternative if California legalizes marijuana sales but at this point there is no data to support such a move.  We also can only speculate whether such a move would actually reduce the violence in Mexico; if there is any truth to the assertion that the cartels are already involved in US domestic drug production, then the answer would almost certainly be no.</p>
<p>This, however, is not to say that we can&#8217;t reduce drug demand.  The last year has seen significant increas in research funding into methamphetamine addiction for which there is currently no proven therapy. The cartels manufacture and create most of the methamphetamine intended for US consumption.  There have been an increasing number of steps taken by the US judicial system to divert drug offenders from prison to rehabilitation and an increasing sense that we incarcerate far too many drug offenders.</p>
<p>What is missing, however, from the discussion is the extent to which reducing drug demand increases our security and thus, is in our national interest to pursue.  There seems to be no interest in discussing the real financial impact of US drug consumption on the Mexican economy. We can read in American newspapers that drug monies contribute anywhere from $12 billion (General Berry McCaffrey) to as much as $35 billion or more but we have no way of assessing which of those extremes is more accurate.</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t seem to discuss to what extent our drug consumption supports the Mexican economy, if it does, and what effect might reducing demand have on increasing emigration from Mexico to the US. </p>
<p>I guess in short, I am glad that there is some sense that we, as a country, bear some responsibility but we need more of of a committment to understanding that relationship and what we can realistically hope to achive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

